
****
tab p_att_clerkship pet_pc if unit_analysis==1
tab r_att_clerkship resp_pc if unit_analysis==1

p_att_clerkship pet_pc if unit_atty==0
r_att_clerkship resp_pc if unit_atty==0
***
tab p_att_clerkship pet_pc if unit_atty==1
tab r_att_clerkship resp_pc if unit_atty==1


*** pct individuals with USCA and/or SCOTUS clerks
disp (92+135+61+91)/(549+500)
*** pct corporations & business with USCA and/or SCOTUS clerks
disp (13+49+12+25+38+91+32+69)/(248+93+252+56)

*** pct US with USCA and/or SCOTUS clerks
disp (109+160+68+110)/(203+294) 



tab p_att_clerkship pet_pc if unit_atty==1
tab r_att_clerkship resp_pc if unit_atty==1


*** pct individuals with USCA and/or SCOTUS clerks (includes minority and poor individuals) 36.7%
disp (91+64+104+139)/(526+560)
*** pct corporations & business with USCA and/or SCOTUS clerks (includes small business, businesses, and corporations) 51%
disp (38+13+90+46+1+2+32+67+12+25)/(4+248+56+2+245+90)
*** pct US with USCA and/or SCOTUS clerks 
disp (110+159+68+108)/(202+293) 90%



**** Conclusion Note illustrating that, on our estimation data, approximately X percent of the SCOTUS attorneys did not have a prior USCA clerkship
p_att_clerk_diff_j_not_USCA p_att_clerk_for_justice_not_USCA p_att_clerk_diff_j_and_USCA p_att_clerk_for_justice_and_USCA p_att_clerk_USCA_highest r_att_clerk_diff_j_not_USCA r_att_clerk_for_justice_not_USCA r_att_clerk_diff_j_and_USCA r_att_clerk_for_justice_and_USCA r_att_clerk_USCA_highest
 
tab p_att_clerk_diff_j_not_USCA if esample==1
tab r_att_clerk_diff_j_not_USCA if esample==1
tab p_att_clerk_for_justice_not_USCA if esample==1
tab r_att_clerk_for_justice_not_USCA if esample==1

tab p_att_clerk_diff_j_and_USCA if esample==1
tab p_att_clerk_for_justice_and_USCA if esample==1
tab r_att_clerk_diff_j_and_USCA if esample==1
tab r_att_clerk_for_justice_and_USCA if esample==1
*** 11.9% of SCOTUS clerks in the estimation dataset never clerked for the USCA
disp (10+5+372+440)/(10+5+372+440+148+2814+2997+159)